perm filename LICK[DOC,TOB] blob
sn#153837 filedate 1975-04-04 generic text, type C, neo UTF8
COMMENT ā VALID 00002 PAGES
C REC PAGE DESCRIPTION
C00001 00001
C00002 00002 comments to Lick
C00007 ENDMK
Cā;
comments to Lick
I want to propose some possible application areas in order to get
feedback, and ask for more information relevant to hand/eye. The
following are areas where we can contribute:
CAD systems for mechanical systems
handling dangerous materials
hardware verification system
photo interpretation
mapping of surface features in depth using sequences of images
shadows
maintenance and repair
sonar and acoustic holography
I will attempt to justify the relevance of each to DoD requirements.
What is the advantage of computer interactive systems for handling
dangerous materials? First, let me make clear what sort of system I
have in mind. This is a computer-aided teleoperator system, with
some stand-alone ability. The system is an interactive system which
augments teleoperator capabilities. It is useful for repetitive
operations, and for operations for which operator error in repetitive
would have messy consequences. The computer would give the advantage
over teleoperator and "teach-mode" control in:
direct sensing of force and touch input
translation from the control device to any manipulator
contingency operations
adaptation by moving until touch, etc
testing and self-calibration, updating, redundancy tests
library of operations
I have in mind ordnance, chemical, biological, and radioactive
materials.
Much of DoD procurement is special purpose, small production systems.
We have underway a project to verify the functioning of digital
hardware. We have a record of accomplishment in this area. Digital
Equipment corporation is using our drawing program for production.
Our graphics systems can be extended slightly to form a CAD system
for complex mechanical devices. A considerable extension would be an
automated prototyping shop. Another extension would be a highly
automated system for aerospace parts programming for machining
operations.
We have considerable expertise which could be applied to maintenance
and repair.
Most of the simple photointerpretation techniques for differencing
fail because of shadows in visual images. That is, these techniques
fail because of differences in sun angle or observer angle. We would
use these differences to map out the height of objects on the
surface, in selected areas of images. This augments a human in ways
that human observers are weak, combining indirect evidence.
IS THERE SUPPORT FOR ANY OF THESE?
Our experience in signal processing, representation and intelligent
systems would be applied to analyzing sound sources and targets.
WHAT IS THE SITUATION OF IMAGE UNDERSTANDING? HOW CAN WE FIND OUT
RAPIDLY WHETHER WE HAVE A PART IN THAT PROGRAM?